Pahl
Pahl v. Bisignano
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 16 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES A. PAHL, No. 24-4005
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00250-CL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
James A. Pahl (“Pahl”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the
Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). benefits under the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
1291. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and history of this case, we do
not recount them…