Pahl

Pahl v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-4005California1,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES A. PAHL, No. 24-4005

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00250-CL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, M. SMITH, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

James A. Pahl (“Pahl”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). benefits under the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1291. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and history of this case, we do

not recount them…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.