Klein

Klein v. Mermelstein

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202524-6427California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE: LESLIE KLEIN, No. 24-6427 Debtor. D.C. No. ___________________ 2:24-cv-04607-JGB

LESLIE KLEIN,

MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT MERMELSTEIN; ESTHER

MERMELSTEIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Debtor Leslie Klein appeals the district court’s order granting Robert and

Esther Mermelstein’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b). Klein appeared before the district court to appeal a

bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.