SensorMetrix

SensorMetrix v. Dzine Unlimited CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2025D084143California2,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 5/16/25 SensorMetrix v. Dzine Unlimited CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SENSORMETRIX, D084143

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2023- 00024668-CU-PA-CTL)

DZINE UNLIMITED, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Eddie C. Sturgeon, Judge. Affirmed. Decker Law, James Decker, Griffin Schindler and Christopher Jones for Defendant and Appellant. Amin Wasserman Gurnani and William P. Cole for Plaintiff and Respondent. SensorMetrix entered into a government contract to make a technology and subcontracted with Dzine Unlimited, Inc. for a portion of the contract. When a dispute arose, Dzine and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.