Harris

Harris v. Luntumbuez CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2025B335247California2,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Filed 5/16/25 Harris v. Luntumbuez CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

KARIO HARRIS, B335247

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV27294) v.

PAUL LUNTUMBUEZ,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gail Killefer, Judge. Affirmed. Kario Harris, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Paul Luntumbuez, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.

__________________________ Kario Harris challenges the dismissal of his suit against Paul Luntumbuez following the trial court’s decision to sustain Luntumbuez’s demurrer to Harris’s second amended complaint.1 Harris contends the court erred in concluding Luntumbuez’s allegedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.