Santiesteban

(PC) Valenzuela v. Santiesteban

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20251:20-cv-01093California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO A. VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01093-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT (ECF No. 76) SANTIESTEBAN, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

Defendants. FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED

ON APRIL 8, 2025 AS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT (ECF No. 30, pp. 4–10) 17 18 Plaintiff Mario A. Valenzuela (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Santiesteban, Rodriguez, and Alejo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Perez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from the incident on June 22, 2019. Pursuant to the Court’s March 4, 2025 amended discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for all stipulated amendments or motions to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.