Scalia

(PC) Beckett v. Scalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20251:20-cv-01468California1,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW H. BECKETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01468-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

FILING OF MAY 15, 2025

v.

SCALIA, et al., (Doc. 96) Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal and Hernandez, failure to protect/failure to intervene claims against Defendant Hackworth, and Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Scalia, Madrigal, Hernandez, Hackworth, and Hurtado. (See Doc. 39.) Plaintiff’s claims against these Defendants arose when he was previously incarcerated at Corcoran State Prison. II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On March 21, 2025, the Court issued its Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. 92.) The order was served to Plaintiff at his then address of record: Matthew H. Beckett, Atascadero State Hospital, P.O. Box…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.