(PC)Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

NINETY DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO

v. IDENTIFY DOE 1 AND DOE

MOORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his complaint on March 3, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Following screening, in relevant part, the Court found Plaintiff states cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Doe 1 and Doe 2. (See Docs. 7 & 13.) The Court now addresses the issue of Plaintiff’s need to identify Doe 1 and Doe 2 against whom his Eighth Amendment claims proceed. II. DISCUSSION Defendants Doe 1 and Doe 2, both physicians, are employed at California State Prison- respond to his pain and medical need for a CPAP device…