Debra Biane v. Universal City Studios LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20252:25-cv-01271California1,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On April 8, 2024, Plaintiffs commenced an action in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, against various, now-dismissed defendants. (See Notice of Removal, Dkt. No. 1, at 1.) On July 18, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint, naming Defendant Universal City Studios, LLC, and Does

CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk DT

through 25. (Id. at 2.) On January 10, 2025, Plaintiffs served amendments to the First Amended Complaint to name Iana Diaz (“Diaz”) as Defendant Doe 1, Ricardo Montes (“Montes”) as Defendant Doe 2, Ana Karagyeyzyan (“Karagyeyzyan”) as Defendant Doe 3 (collectively, “Doe Defendants”). (Id.) On January 17, 2025, Plaintiffs served their Statement of Damages in the State Court Action. (Id. at 3.) On February 13, 2025, Defendant Universal removed the case to this Court. (See Dkt. No. 1.)

On March 17, 2025, Plaintiffs filed the Motion on the basis that (1) Defendant Universal did not timely file their notice of removal within thirty days of being able to ascertain the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, and (2) Defendant Universal cannot prove that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.