(PC) Hinton v. Sergeant Mix

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20251:24-cv-00960California1,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATOMEE HINTON, No. 1:24-cv-00960-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

v. DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS MIX, et al., Doc. 18 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Natomee Hinton is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 11, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the third amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action proceed on plaintiff’s third amended complaint against: (1) defendants Mix and Vang for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) defendants Vang, Giannini, and Baker for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (3) defendants Mix and Vang for state law assault and battery; and (4) defendant Mix for state law intentional infliction of emotional distress. Doc. 18. The magistrate judge further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.