Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20255:22-cv-04844California1,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTON TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL ZAZZLE, INC., et al., SHOULD BE SEALED Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 362]

13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff”) Administrative Motion to Consider 14 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed. ECF 362. On March 6, 2025, Defendants 15 Zazzle Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a statement in 16 support of sealing the materials identified in Plaintiff’s motion. ECF 370. Plaintiff did not submit 17 any response to Defendants’ statement in support of sealing. 18 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

20 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and 21 documents, including judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.