Jones

Jones v. Oceanside Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20253:25-cv-01091California2,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, Case No.: 25cv1091 BEN (BLM)

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND (2) DISMISSING FIRST

VISTA COURT ROOM-23 and JOHN

AMENDED PETITION WITHOUT

DOE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

PREJUDICE Respondents. 16 [ECF No. 4] 17 On April 25, 2025, Wayne Elijah Jones (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) On May 5, 2025, the Court dismissed the habeas action for failure to satisfying the filing fee requirement, failure to state a cognizable federal claim, and failure to allege exhaustion of state judicial remedies and directed that in order to reopen and proceed with the instant case, Petitioner must submit, no later than July 1, 2025, both a First Amended Petition which cured those pleading deficiencies along with either the $5.00 filing fee or adequate proof…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.