Laatz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

v. CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER

PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., SEALED Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 373]

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and To Consider Whether Defendants’ Material Should be Sealed, filed in connection with their Administrative Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. ECF 373. Defendants filed a statement in response to Plaintiff’s motion. ECF 383. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner…