Cameron Harrell v. Dayalji R. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20255:25-cv-00486California684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 25-0486 JGB (SPx) Date May 16, 2025 Title Cameron Harrell v. Dayalji R. Patel

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order (1) DISMISSING Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to Prosecute; and (2) DIRECTING the Clerk to Close the Case (IN CHAMBERS)

On February 24, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1.) On August 7, 2024, the Court instituted a limited scheduling order. (“Scheduling Order,” Dkt. No. 12.) The Scheduling Order provides the following:

1. Proofs of Service: Proofs of service for all defendants must be filed within 90 days of the filing of the case absent a previously approved extension of time by the Court or a motion or responsive pleading by all defendants. The Court expects that the Complaint will be served on all parties promptly after filing.

2. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.