Andrews

(HC) A.E. v. Andrews

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20251:25-cv-00107California3,708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 A.E., ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-00107-KES-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO ) DENY RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ) (Doc. 11), GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF ) HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECT RESPONDENT v. ) TO PROVIDE BOND HEARING BEFORE AN ) IMMIGRATION JUDGE ) TONYA ANDREWS1, Facility Administrator, ) ) Respondent. )

) ) 19 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding with counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to the undersigned for findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 23

1 Respondent moves to dismiss all unlawfully named officials. As explained by the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 430 (2004), the proper respondent in habeas cases is the “warden of the facility where the prisoner is being held, not the Attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.