(PC) Kern v. Sacramento County Main Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20252:24-cv-02615California5,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CURTIS KERN, No. 2:24-cv-2615 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, ORDER v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY MAIN JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As set forth below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is dismissed with leave to amend. I. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT A. First Claim In his verified FAC, plaintiff first challenges the conditions of confinement at the Sacramento County Jail, listing the following violations: “breach of the standard of care, failure to treat health consequences of his allergic reaction to mold, and violated Fourteenth Amendment.” (ECF No. 14 at 4.) Plaintiff alleges as follows. On October 7, 2022, plaintiff was put in contaminated cell 5e213 where a black mold was seeping through the baseboard. (Id.) Plaintiff began experiencing sharp pains on the left side of his chest, breathing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.