Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE PALACIOS, Case No. 2:25-cv-0114-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. VAUGHN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, brings this § 1983 action against defendants W. Vaughn, Deepthi Sursupui, and E. Pedersen, alleging that they violated his constitutional rights by not transferring him to a prison with better medical facilities. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff fails to state a cognizable § 1983 claim. Plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted herein. I will grant his most recent application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 18, and deny his previous application, ECF No. 16, as moot. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion…