(PS) Sparks v. City of Turlock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20252:25-cv-01298California2,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA SPARKS, Case No. 2:25-cv-1298-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF TURLOCK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Christina Sparks, proceeding without counsel, filed this action against the City of Turlock, Turlock Police Department, Turlock Police Officers Kim Briggs and Austin Wilson, Stanislaus County District Attorney’s Office, Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Jack Mark Jacobson. The complaint fails to state a cognizable claim. I will dismiss it with leave to amend to afford plaintiff an opportunity to cure the deficiencies herein noted. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2), but deny her motion for electronic filing, ECF No 3.1 24 1 Generally, “any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with 25 permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.