James Parker v. Daniel Driscoll

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202523-35510California767 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES PARKER, No. 23-35510

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01451-IM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL DRISCOLL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

James Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se

complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

(“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 791, and judicially noticing certain documents

from Parker’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.