James Parker v. Daniel Driscoll
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202523-35510California767 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES PARKER, No. 23-35510
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01451-IM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DANIEL DRISCOLL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Army,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
James Parker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se
complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”),
29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 791, and judicially noticing certain documents
from Parker’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…