Bisignano

Johnson v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202524-3006California1,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IVY DARLENE JOHNSON, No. 24-3006 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-01524-JAT v.

MEMORANDUM**

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,*

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2025*** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

* Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Frank Bisignano, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Social Security, is automatically substituted as Defendant-Appellee. ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We therefore deny as moot Appellant’s request to have a certain individual appear on her behalf at oral argument. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.