Bondi

Antonio Mendanha v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202524-2607California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDUARDO ANTONIO No. 24-2607 MENDANHA; PATRICIA KELLEN Agency Nos.

SENA ALVES MENDANHA; CARLOS A246-009-658

EDUARDO ALVES MENDANHA, A246-009-657

A246-009-659

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

Antonio Mendanha, native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.