Collins
Collins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID COLLINS, an individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01368-RBM-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, [Docs. 40, 42–46] Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court are various motions filed by pro se Plaintiff David Collins (“Plaintiff”) challenging this Court’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“MTD Order”). (See Docs. 40, 42–46.) The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motions challenging this Court’s MTD Order are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On January 4, 2024, the Court issued its MTD Order, which granted in part and denied in part Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to …