Dickerson

Dickerson v. Macmillan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20253:23-cv-01320California3,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRENNA DICKERSON, Case No. 23-cv-01320-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND GRANTING

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

ANDY MACMILLAN, et al., SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 68, 70, 71,

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. ECF 71. Because the Court determined the motion was suitable for decision without oral argument, it vacated the May 8, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, including the Court’s Order dismissing the first amended complaint, ECF 60. Having read the papers submitted by the parties and carefully considered the arguments therein, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. Also before the Court are four administrative motions to seal, ECF 63, 68, 70, 76, which the Court GRANTS for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.