McGee

McGee v. The City of Hercules

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20253:23-cv-05161California2,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-05161-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR

v. SANCTIONS

THE CITY OF HERCULES, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 66 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are two motions for sanctions brought by Plaintiff Anthony McGee. ECF Nos. 38, 66. Defendants City of Hercules and Hercules Police Department (“HPD”) filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s first Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 46) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF No. 57). The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions for sanctions. II. DISCUSSION A. First Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 38) 1. Requests for Judicial Notice Mr. McGee asks the Court to take judicial notice of two documents filed in United States v. McGee, No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.