Gruzd

Pasture Gate Holdings, Inc. v. Gruzd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20253:24-cv-00886California3,579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PASTURE GATE HOLDINGS, INC., a Case No.: 3:24-CV-00886-L-BJC North Carolina corporation,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v. 14 NADIA GRUZD, an individual, [ECF No. 24] 15 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Nadia Gruzd’s (“Gruzd” or “Defendant”) motion for dismiss the amended complaint. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff Pasture Gate Holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a response and Defendant a reply. (ECF Nos. 25, 26.) Defendant also filed a request for judicial notice. (ECF No. 24-2.) The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted without oral argument. See Civ. LR 7.1(d.1). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied. 24 25 Both parties list AllMed Search, LLC as a defendant on the caption. The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 24) was filed on behalf of this party as well as Gruzd. However, Plaintiff’s operative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.