McCully

McCully v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20253:25-cv-00478California1,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE MCCULLY, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00478-JES-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPOINT COUNSEL; and Defendant. (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO ELECTRONICALLY

FILE DOCUMENTS

18 [ECF Nos. 2, 7]

20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Rose McCully’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to 21 appoint counsel (ECF No. 2) and motion for leave to electronically file documents (ECF 22 No. 7). After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 23 WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motion to appoint counsel and GRANTS the motion for 24 leave to electronically file documents. 25 On February 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant alleging various 26 violations under the Federal Torts Claim Act. See generally ECF No. 1. The same day, 27 28 Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel. ECF No. 2. On April 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.