Estrada

Estrada v. Real Time Resolutions Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20255:25-cv-02782California1,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BYRON ESTRADA, Case No. 25-cv-02782-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER

REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 20] Defendants.

12 On May 9, 2025, Plaintiff Byron Estrada (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin Defendants from foreclosing Plaintiff’s property at 874 Lakewood Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (“the Property”), “[a]ccruing additional interest on the disputed debt,” and “[e]ngaging in further collection activities.” ECF 20 (“Mot.”). On May 14, Defendant Real Time Resolutions Inc. (“Real Time”) filed an opposition. ECF 24 (“Opp.”). On May 19, 2025, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff failed to appear. Defense Counsel did appear. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing a noticed motion for a preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.