Stout Law Firm, LLP v. Laurensays 5
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20258:25-cv-00126California832 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 8:25-cv-00126-FWS-ADS Date: May 16, 2025 Title: Stout Law Firm, LLP, et al. v. Laurensays 5, et al.
Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, FAILURE TO TIMELY
SERVE THE COMPLAINT, LACK OF PROSECUTION, AND
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS [24] [26]
In this case, Plaintiffs Stout Law Firm, LLP and James Russel Stout (together, “Plaintiffs”) assert claims against Defendants LaurenSays5, Nikko. B., Robert M., Ruby M., Melinda K., Alyssa M., Charlotte T., Kathryn M., Cassandra W., Lauren Antonia Neumann (“Neumann”), and unnamed Does (collectively, “Defendants”). (See generally Dkt. 11 (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”).) Plaintiffs previously filed an Application for Entry of Default…