Stout Law Firm, LLP v. Laurensays 5

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20258:25-cv-00126California832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-00126-FWS-ADS Date: May 16, 2025 Title: Stout Law Firm, LLP, et al. v. Laurensays 5, et al.

Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, FAILURE TO TIMELY

SERVE THE COMPLAINT, LACK OF PROSECUTION, AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS [24] [26]

In this case, Plaintiffs Stout Law Firm, LLP and James Russel Stout (together, “Plaintiffs”) assert claims against Defendants LaurenSays5, Nikko. B., Robert M., Ruby M., Melinda K., Alyssa M., Charlotte T., Kathryn M., Cassandra W., Lauren Antonia Neumann (“Neumann”), and unnamed Does (collectively, “Defendants”). (See generally Dkt. 11 (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”).) Plaintiffs previously filed an Application for Entry of Default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.