State of CA v. Del Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20252:23-cv-00743California2,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 State of California, No. 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, ORDER v. Phillip Del Rosa, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendants move the court to stay the district court proceedings in this action, excluding 18 proceedings to supervise compliance with the standing preliminary injunction, pending an order 19 on the interlocutory appeal now before the Ninth Circuit. California opposes the motion. As 20 explained below, the court denies the motion to stay and addresses the scope of the automatic stay herein. 22 I. BACKGROUND The court explained the relevant factual background in multiple previous orders and 24 therefore explains the facts here only to the extent necessary. See Order (Sept. 8, 2024), ECF No. 43; Order (Jan. 24, 2024), ECF No. 58; Order (Nov. 18, 2024), ECF No. 97. Defendants

Phillip Del Rosa and Daren Rose1 are tribal officers of the federally recognized Indian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.