Gamez

] 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARECELY GAMEZ, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01464-DAD-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 39)

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A.,

15 || INC., Defendant. 17 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 39), 19 || and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 20 || 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 22 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 11 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction 25 || for disputes concerning…