Bozorgkhoo

Bozorgkhoo v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20252:24-cv-03154California5,729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAKINEH BOZORGKHOO, et al., No. 2:24-cv-03154 CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Six plaintiffs, one United States citizen and five Iranian citizens, proceed on a petition for writ of mandamus and complaint for injunctive relief.1 (ECF No. 1.) Defendants Anthony Blinken and Robert Jachim, federal officials sued in their official capacity, seek to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 11.) In the alternative, Defendants seek summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.) A hearing on Defendants’ motion was held on April 1, 2025, with Alexander Loznak appearing on behalf of Plaintiffs and Elliot Wong appearing on behalf of Defendants. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff Sakineh Bozorgkhoo was also present. After the hearing, the Court ordered the parties to

Pursuant to the parties’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.