(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Rio Consumnes Correctional Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20252:24-cv-00333California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROMAINE MORGAN, No. 2:24-cv-00333-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY RIO

COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL

CENTER, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On November 14, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915A. ECF No. 5. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and identify 22 defendants and granted plaintiff 120 days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the 23 deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in a 24 recommendation that this action be dismissed. 25 The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 26 otherwise responded to the court’s order. Thus, it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.