Zubrick

Zubrick v. Akhtar CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2025B329182California4,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Filed 5/20/25 Zubrick v. Akhtar CA2/

NO/T TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

STUART LEE ZUBRICK, B329182

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC651071) v.

SAHIBZADA AASIM AKHTAR,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Holly J. Fujie, Judge. Affirmed. Buxbaum Chakmak & Wynder, Charlene J. Wynder and Neil J. Kantor for Defendant and Appellant. David Fu & Associates, David D. Fu and Vigen Stepanyan for Plaintiff and Respondent.

__________________________ Sahibzada Aasim Akhtar appeals from a judgment following a bench trial in favor of plaintiff Stuart Lee Zubrick. The trial court quieted title to two properties in Zubrick’s favor,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.