Reed

United States v. Reed

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202524-4002California805 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4002 D.C. Nos. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-00479-JSW-1 4:23-cv-02137-JSW v.

STEVEN REED, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, Chief District Judge.***

Steven Reed appeals the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to

amend or vacate his sentence for possession of child pornography, in violation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.