Olivares-Acevedo

Olivares-Acevedo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202524-1021California344 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGEL OMAR OLIVARES-ACEVEDO, No. 24-1021 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-157-010 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BENNETT and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Angel Omar Olivares-Acevedo, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing

his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of law, including questions concerning

the agency’s jurisdiction, de novo. Hernandez v. Holder, 738 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.