People v. Cook CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2025C100319California3,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 5/20/25 P. v. Cook CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100319

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 20FE000410)

v.

TRISTAN COOK,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Tristan Cook guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter. It also found true two firearm enhancements. The trial court sentenced defendant to 12 years four months in prison. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss one of his two firearm enhancements because the court failed to assess his future dangerousness if it dismissed the enhancement. We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The information charged defendant with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.