Millan

People v. Millan

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2025F087198California9,854 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Jorge Alberto Millan and Elizabeth Jara were charged with the attempted murder of their six-week-old son X. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 187, subd. (a), 664; count 1), torture of X. (§ 206; count 2), felony child abuse of X. (§ 273a, subd. (a); count 3), and misdemeanor child abuse of their one-year-old daughter L. (§ 273a, subd. (b); count 4). As to counts 1 and 3, the information alleged defendants personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (d)). A jury found Millan guilty as charged and found true the great bodily injury enhancement. The jury found Jara not guilty on count 1, guilty on count 2 of the lesser included offense of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4)), and guilty as charged on counts 3 and 4. The jury also found true the great bodily injury enhancement to count 3. Various aggravating sentencing factors were found true as to both defendants. Millan was sentenced to a term of life with the possibility of parole. Jara was sentenced to an aggregate term of nine years, which includes a five-year term for the great bodily injury enhancement. On appeal, Jara argues the evidence is insufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.