Poinsetta Mark v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20252:24-cv-01995California4,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Justin A. Palmer (SBN. 270857)

FILER PALMER, LLP

249 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 101 Long Beach, CA 90802 3 Telephone: (562) 304-5200 Facsimile: (562) 394-0104 Email: justin@filerpalmer.com 5 Counsel for Plaintiff, 6 POINSETTA MARK, individually and as successor in interest to SAMUEL MARK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POINSETTA MARK, individually and Case No. 2:24-cv-01995-AH (KESx) as successor in interest to SAMUEL

MARK,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.