Clinton

Clinton v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20253:23-cv-01471California728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKEITH CLINTON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01471-CAB-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

C. ALLEN, et al., [Doc. Nos. 47, 59] Defendants. 16 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s amended complaint but gave Plaintiff (proceeding pro se) leave to file an amended complaint. Defendant-Officers Allen, Colon, and Bingham have filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC). [Doc. No. 47.] The Court grants Defendants’ motion and partially dismisses the SAC with prejudice. II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC and permitted only two causes of action to proceed: (1) an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against John Does 1 and 2 and (2) a conspiracy claim to deprive Plaintiff of his Eighth Amendment right to protection from known and substantial risks of harm involving Defendants Allen,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.