Trate

(HC) Dorise v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20251:22-cv-01423California592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKHAEL CHARLES DORISE Case No. 1:22-cv-01423-JLT-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

B. M. TRATE, COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE, AND

DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY (Doc. 1)

Mikhael Charles Dorise is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 17, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the § 2241 petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under Jones v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465, 469 (2023), and that the court decline to issue a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 8.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.