Huaqin Yin v. David M. Radel

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20252:25-cv-01769California718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-1769 PA (ASx) Date May 19, 2025 Title Huaqin Yin v. David M. Radel

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: COURT ORDER-IN CHAMBERS On May 5, 2025, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause regarding dismissal for lack of prosecution (“OSC”) based on the failure of defendant David M. Radel (“Defendant’’) to file an answer to the complaint within 60 days of service. (Docket No. 10.) The Court’s OSC warned that failure to respond by May 12, 2025 may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. As of today’s date, Plaintiff has not sought any relief as a result of Defendant’s failure to respond to the complaint or filed a written response to the

OSC.

The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.