(PC) Young v. Corcoran State Prison Visiting Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20251:24-cv-00776California2,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 GALE J. YOUNG, et al. No. 1:24-cv-00776-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. SUBSTITUTE DOE DEFENDANT, AND

DENYING SECOND MOTION FOR

CORCORAN STATE PRISON VISITING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, WITHOUT

STAFF, PREJUDICE

10 Defendants. (ECF No. 37)

12 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. DISCUSSION On October 29, 2024, the Court found that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint stated a cognizable claim for improper denial of regular visitation privileges with his family while detained at Corcoran State Prison against the Doe Defendant(s). (ECF No. 16.) The Court allowed Plaintiff to issue a subpoena to Corcoran State Prison in order to identify the Doe Defendants described in the operative complaint. (ECF No. 15, 16.) On November 15, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.