Holly Arlena Vaughan v. Quicken Loans Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:25-cv-04020-MWC-AGR Date: May 20, 2025 Title Holly Arlena Vaughan v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al.
Present: The Honorable: Michelle Williams Court, United States District Judge
T. Jackson Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A N/A
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order DENYING Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. 23) and MOOTING Plaintiff’s motion to strike (Dkt. 35)
Before the Court is an ex parte application to remand and request for sanctions filed by Plaintiff Holly Arlena Vaughan (“Plaintiff”). Dkts. # 23 (“App.”), 28 (“Mot.”). Defendants Quicken Loans, Inc. (“Quicken Loans”) and Nationstar Mortgage LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper (“Nationstar”) opposed. Dkts. # 30 (“QL Opp.”), 33 (“NS Opp.”). Plaintiff replied to each opposition. Dkts. # 35 (“Reply to QL Opp.”), 38 (“Reply to NS Opp.”). The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. Having considered the papers, the Court DENIES the application to remand.