Hazari
Hazari v. County of Santa Clara
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CYRUS HAZARI, Case No. 19-cv-04392-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A
v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., [Re: ECF No. 102, 103, 104] Defendants.
12 On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff Cyrus Hazari (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order requesting the Court to stay all proceedings in this case for a year. See ECF 102 at 2; ECF 103; ECF 104. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s papers and concludes no response from Defendants is required. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts use the same standard for issuing a temporary restraining order as that for issuing a preliminary injunction. See Washington v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151, 1159 n.3 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[T]he legal standards applicable to TROs and preliminary injunctions are substantially identical.”…