Aragon
Aragon v. DZR Group Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Daniel ARAGON, Case No.: 25-cv-0264-AGS-BLM Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE (ECF 5), DISMISSING
v.
COMPLAINT (ECF 6), AND
DZR GROUP INC., et al., GRANTING FURTHER LEAVE TO
AMEND
Defendants. 8 Plaintiff Daniel Aragon initially brought causes of action arising out of defendant’s alleged debt-collection practices. (See generally ECF 1.) The Court screened Aragon’s complaint and dismissed only the claims based on purported continued debt collection without verification. (See ECF 4, at 5, 8); see also 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(b); Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.52(c). “All other claims survive[d] screening.” (Id. at 8.) Aragon was granted leave to amend the dismissed claims “by May 8, 2025.” (Id.) On May 19, 2025, it appeared that no amended complaint had been filed, so this Court ordered Aragon “to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” (ECF 5.) …