Bell v. Oama Coronado LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BELL, et al., Case No.: 25-cv-01170-CAB-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO DISMISS AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

OAMA CORONADO LLC, et al., [Doc. No 5] Defendants. 16 On May 7, 2025, Plaintiffs Michael Bell and Lisa Philips filed a complaint against Defendants Oama Coronado LLC, Todd Brisco & Associates, Valerie Sparks, Judge Peter F. Murray, and Sirein Roman. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiffs filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.] Plaintiffs also filed a motion to stay ongoing Superior Court proceedings. [Doc. No. 3.] The Court allowed Plaintiffs to proceed IFP but dismissed the complaint and denied the motion for stay with leave to amend. [Doc. No. 4.] Plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint. [Doc. No. 5.] The Court again screens the amended complaint and dismisses without leave to amend. The Court construes Plaintiffs’ amended…