Sheehan

(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20252:23-cv-00235California866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 2:23-cv-0235-DC-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER X. SHEEHAN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed his third amended complaint. ECF No. 26. The complaint is, as discussed below, deficient because it fails to provide most of the named defendants sufficient notice of the claims against them as required by Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend so that he may attempt to remedy its deficiencies. This will be his final opportunity to amend. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.