(PS) Coleman v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20252:23-cv-02677California472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACQUELINE COLEMAN, No. 2:23-cv-2677-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil complaint and the matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On April 2, 2025, plaintiff’s amended complaint was found not to state a claim and was dismissed with leave to amend. (See ECF No. 22.) The undersigned ordered that plaintiff file any amended complaint within 30 days of the date of that order. (Id. at 10.) Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that failure to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought an extension of time to do so, or otherwise communicated with the court. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.