Sanchez-Caceres

Sanchez-Caceres v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202524-3457California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VILMA ARACELY SANCHEZ- No. 24-3457 CACERES, Agency No.

A208-270-349

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 19, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and RASH, District Judge.***

Vilma Aracely Sanchez-Caceres (“Sanchez”), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Scott H. Rash, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.