Martinez-Ortiz

Martinez-Ortiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202524-727California2,380 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS MANO MARTINEZ- No. 24-727 ORTIZ; CLAUDIA CAROLINA Agency Nos.

CHACHAGUA-MAYE; JAQUELINE A216-656-154

MARTINEZ-CHACHAGUA, A216-656-155

A216-656-156

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.

Carlos Martinez-Ortiz, his wife Claudia Chachagua-Maye, and their minor

daughter, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from an order of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying their claims for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.