Blanco-Rivera

Blanco-Rivera v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202524-657California552 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTINIANO BLANCO-RIVERA, No. 24-657 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-944-417 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 19, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Martiniano Blanco-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal

from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his application for asylum and

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the denial of asylum and withholding of removal for substantial evidence. Duran-

Rodriguez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.