Blanco-Rivera
Blanco-Rivera v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 202524-657California552 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTINIANO BLANCO-RIVERA, No. 24-657 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-944-417 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 19, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Martiniano Blanco-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal
from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his application for asylum and
withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the denial of asylum and withholding of removal for substantial evidence. Duran-